Dear Mahesh and all involved,
thank you!
Sure, we will address all improvement suggestions received.
Though I happen to be on vacation until mid of next week,
we likely can provide the new version before that.
David
On 05.09.24 22:18, Mahesh Jethanandani wrote:
Hi Authors,
Congratulations on getting the draft through IESG!
Before I send the document to the RFC Editor, I want to make sure that
all outstanding comments that came up in IESG are addressed.
The first is with Deb, and her DISCUSS, which she changed to a
COMMENT. Michael suggested that you could add the voucher process to
Figure 2. Can that be added?
On Gunter’s COMMENT, Steffen promised to incorporate some the changes
suggested by Gunter.
For Roman, Steffen suggested some updates. Are you waiting on a
response from Roman to incorporate the changes?
John pointed out a few nits. Please consider them.
Murray’s assertion was that the terms "asynchronous communication" and
"synchronous communication” are NOT used in the document. Why then do
we need them in the terminology section? Can we remove them?
Once you have posted a -13 version of the draft to address all the
above items, I will be happy to send the document on its way.
Thanks.
Mahesh Jethanandani
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
