Tim wrote:
> This document says it "Updates 8995" yet there is no section in the
document
> with the updates to 8955. This is usually the case.Well, it's the Introduction. 8995 left a socket to be filled, and this document fills it. There are no changes to 8995 in the sense that an implementation that implements 8995 does not need to change unless they want this. Does this make you happier? https://github.com/anima-wg/brski-cloud/pull/new/updates-8995 Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanand...@gmail.com> wrote: > I had advised Michael of the same, and he did add it in the > Introduction section, last paragraph, except, you will not see it > referenced as [RFC8995], but rather [BRSKI]. > One thing I did forget to mention to him was to the same for the Abstract, except there he does not need to provide an explanation. So a statement that says: > “This document updates [BRSKI].” Done. -- Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list -- anima@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to anima-le...@ietf.org
