Esko Dijk <[email protected]> wrote: > The -19 has an issue that the YANG module descriptions are not updated > w.r.t. what we have in the repository! > Just as an example, the dual "revision" statement which was merged does not > show up in -19. And there's more.
Oh.
> In particular, for the SID allocation tables the '...' notation needs to
be
> defined (see PR).
> And the module SID allocations would be nice to repeat in the table too -
no
> need to exclude there.
Probably, we should do a show-and-tell for netmod/netconf about this display.
> When submitting the -20, we should check that the changes made in the YANG
> module actually propagate to the draft text to be uploaded.
I think you are saying that the yang module in the I-D did not match what we had
because something was not re-processed in makefile?
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | IoT architect [
] [email protected] http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
