Hi Michael, Picking up on this errata, my read is that the change is significant. For the change to be verified, it has to be editorial in nature, which this is not. I can mark it HFDU though.
Does anyone have any objection to marking this errata as such? I will wait for the customary 2-week period. If no objections are received, I will proceed with marking it as HFDU. Cheers. > On Jan 2, 2025, at 10:44 AM, Michael Richardson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, > I filed this errata in 2021: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6648 > > It never got marked as verified, so it does not appear in the patched RFC. > Could it get verified please? > > -- > ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ > ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | IoT architect [ > ] [email protected] http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails > [ > Mahesh Jethanandani [email protected]
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
