Esko Dijk <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for the feedback. It looks like the draft is struggling between the > viewpoints of "cBRSKI is a new protocol based on BRSKI" vs "cBRSKI equals > BRSKI and is a variant on it".
In general, I have used and pushed others to use the
draft-kuehlewind-rswg-updates-tag stuff, even though a few had small problems
with it that kept it stagnating.
RFC9914 got through with amends/extends, although there were some bumps.
> cBRSKI is an extension of BRSKI (without impacting existing
implementations),
> however the document also does provide some normative updates to
BRSKI/8995
> which might impact existing implementations in case they weren't doing
these
> things right.
> The namings "BRSKI-EST" and "BRSKI-MASA" are used to divide all protocol
> interactions into 2 groups. This way of dividing would conceptually hold
for
> cBRSKI, but also for existing BRSKI (8995).
> An alternate way to summarize this very shortly would be like this:
> cBRSKI = cBRSKI-EST + cBRSKI-MASA
> BRSKI = BRSKI-EST + BRSKI-MASA
> This is probably confusing as well, because it uses another definition for
> these terms. The key thing I think is that "BRSKI-EST" as used now in the
> draft is a way to say "The Pledge-to-Registrar interactions of any BRSKI
type
> protocol (including 8995 and cBRSKI and possible others)".
Yes.
The BRSKI-MASA side of things is being extended.
I'd have to look again if there was anything on that side that gets amended.
cBRSKI-EST is clearly extending RFC9148 by adding the new resources.
I think we are also **amending** it with draft-ietf-core-uri-path-abbrev.
> Maybe we should call it "Pledge-to-Registrar Scope" or
"Pledge-to-Registrar
> Leg" or so instead of BRSKI-EST.
More words do not always help.
I think that this is pretty niche.
Search engines and LLMs seem to know what BRSKI-EST, so leave it alone.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
** My working hours and your working hours may be different. **
** Please do not feel obligated to reply outside your normal working hours **
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anima mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
