Hi, Toerless,
It is a good suggestion that we (as ANIMA WG) ask for early review from these
DIRs. It would certainly help us to further raise the quality of this document
in the WG document stage. I will fill the requests.
Cheers,
Sheng
Toerless Eckert<[email protected]> On Wednesday, Jun
24, 2026, 13:01 wrote:
Hi Sheng,
After finishing the feedback fro Stuart Cheshire's review,
I think we've exhausted feedback from WG and other known experts (like Stuart),
so as i already was suggesting at IETF125 meeting, i would suggest that we ask
for early review (early because the document is still in WG)
- OPSDIR
- RTGDIR
- IOTDIR
I am not sure which other directorates would have substantial feedback. DNS
directorate
i think in general has no expertise of DNS-SD except for Stuart who alredy
provided
feedback.
Feedback until Tuesday of IETF week would be great so i could take that
feedback into acocunt.
Writeup suggested:
This document introduces the use of discovery mechanisms such as CORE-LF,
DNS-SD (unicast, mDNS)
and GRASP to automate the deployment of the key enrollment protocol BRSKI into
arbitrary
networks using whatever the most appropriate discovery mechanism is and
supporting all
the different potentially non-interoperable versions of BRSKI depending on
which individual
(network) devices want to support.
This dradft is primarily a specification of the mechanism, but if there are
significant gaps
for understanding how to operationalize this technology that are not better
answered in a separate
optional focussed document, we also like to hear feedback about that.
Thanks
Toerless
_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]_______________________________________________
Anima mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
