Hi Michael, > > CRI Scheme Number: TBA from the Expert Review range > > CRI Scheme Number: TBA from the First Come First Served range > > okay... > > But, href-30 says: > > | Identifier (URI) Schemes Registry may indicate that there are > | special requirements on the CRI scheme number to be assigned for > | the new URI Scheme. > | If that is not the case, IANA will assign a value autonomously. > > As we *DO NOT* have special requirements, it would be fine: > > If no requirement is specified in the registration, IANA will > autonomously assign a number in the range 1000 to 20000, inclusive, > that has not yet been used. > > > (As far as I know, we can not use the CRI in the core?rt= reply)
I might be misreading this, but if you mean (as href-30 seems to mean) that we should take the absence of a CRI request as an indication that we should go ahead and assign an FCFS number, there are two issues: For us, if the IANA Considerations section doesn't mention the CRI field, we have no way of knowing whether this was a deliberate omission, whether the authors meant to request an Expert Review number but forgot to add it to the section, or whether they simply weren't aware of the field. During these pre-meeting reviews, we often send messages pointing out that a registry has a new name or a new field. The other issue is that without that field, the RFC Editor won't have a place to record the number. thanks, Amanda _______________________________________________ Anima mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
