In un messaggio del Saturday 11 September 2010, Paolo Cavallini ha scritto:
> Il 10/09/2010 20:46, Anne Ghisla ha scritto:
> > Feedback on the idea is most welcome!
> 
> While I think WPS is an interesting approach, being so much more general,
> and easy to use for people who are not interested in technicalities, I
> still do not like the idea of not being able to modify the analyses to be
> run. I prefer to have full control over my analyses. The key word under
> the free software movement is for me "user empowerment".
> If the installation of the server will be not more complicated than the
> current situation, that's fine with me, otherwise I'd prefer to have the
> programs running on my machines.
> But that's only my personal preference, of course.
> All the best, and thanks.

+1

Better to stick with a known hell (dependencies) than move to an unknown, new 
hell (distributed services).

-- 
A university is what a college becomes when the faculty loses interest
in students.
                -- John Ciardi
-----------------------------------------------------------
Damiano G. Preatoni, PhD

Unità di Analisi e Gestione delle Risorse Ambientali
Dipartimento Ambiente-Salute-Sicurezza
Università degli Studi dell'Insubria
Via J.H. Dunant, 3 - 21100 Varese (ITALY)

tel +39 0332421538 fax +39 0332421446
http://biocenosi.dipbsf.uninsubria.it/
ICQ: 78690321 jabber: [email protected] skype: prea.net
-----------------------------------------------------------
Please consider the environment before printing this email
Please do not send attachments in proprietary formats
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Use the UNI CEI Standard ISO/IEC 26300:2006
-----------------------------------------------------------
O< stop html mail - http://www.asciiribbon.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
AniMov mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.faunalia.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/animov

Reply via email to