On Jun 20, 2014 6:08 PM, "Bill Hunt" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks Randall - I was checking in on IRC to take the temperature before bringing it to the list for the larger discussion, but let's jump in! > > So, the short version is, we started down the rabbit hole of mocha-sauce, but found that it doesn't actually report back failures properly, and the issue is deep in the webdriver dependency and probably too much work to resolve. The next most popular option for Saucelabs integration is grunt-saucelabs which works perfectly, but requires grunt. It's pretty coupled to grunt tasks too, so it'd require a bit of rewrite to get it to work without grunt. > > Stepping back, Saucelabs was the second choice after Browserling did not behave as expected or provide any of the reporting tools that make Saucelabs great. We could totally look into yet another option, but SL does most of what we need, and is free for opensource. Choosing another option would also put us back to the start. >
I would at least want to check out browserstack, which is distinct from browserling/testling. It's also free for OSS AFAIK. > The runner issue is a separate one, since we are encountering the same hurdles with both of the previous services, namely that it requires running the service locally and SSH tunneling to your local machine to run the tests - requiring either a test server or no automation. So that part will probably need to be redone regardless. > TravisCI is a solution for this. We run hypothesis tests through Travis with a sauce tunnel.
_______________________________________________ annotator-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/annotator-dev Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/annotator-dev
