On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Marc-Antoine Lemieux < [email protected]> wrote:
> I'm still wondering if using master was the right choice at the beginning, > but since I knew we would mosty certainly want to customize the behavior > (which we did), the new version seemed to be better than v1 (better code > organization and so on). > I'm pretty confident it will be better. We are trying to preserve compatibility as much as possible and make migration easy. In some ways it's maybe harder to work off master now than it would be to migrate once we release v2. Also, it's completely my fault for putting master in a very intermediate state back in May and then not getting back to it. I at least should have added the warning at the top of the README that Nick has now put in place. But the bleeding edge is fun, isn't it? It would be great to have anyone testing and using the tip of master, but I don't want to encourage it when it could be a time sink for you. On the other hand, contributions from more people following the tip could really speed things along.
_______________________________________________ annotator-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/annotator-dev Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/annotator-dev
