[this announcement is available online at https://s.apache.org/TGuO ]

by Rich Bowen

Within The Apache Software Foundation, many of us have different roles. I am a 
committer on the Apache httpd project, and also a PMC member on that project. I 
am the Vice President, Conferences. I am a board member. And I’m a member of 
the Foundation. I'm also an employee of Red Hat, and may, at times, be 
perceived to be speaking for my employer.

I am a father, husband, brother, son, employee, and so on. How I interact with 
my daughter is very different from how I interact with my manager. I use 
different language, wield different authority, and expect different results.

Ten years ago at ApacheCon in Oakland, Bertrand Delacretaz gave a talk about 
hats [photo at 
https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/success-at-apache-wearing-small ]. We 
all laughed a lot. But he was making a serious point. At the Apache Software 
Foundation –indeed, in life– we all wear many different hats.

However, whereas it's pretty clear, in real life, whether I’m addressing my 
daughter or my manager, on Apache mailing lists it's seldom, if ever, clear 
which hat I'm wearing in any given situation.

I like to operate on the following principle when communicating in the Apache 
community: Wear the smallest hat possible for the situation, but assume that 
everyone is seeing the biggest hat possible.

So, what does that mean?

In the list above of my Apache hats (Committer, PMC Member, Foundation Member, 
V.P. Conferences, Director), there are various levels of authority. As a 
project committer, I can make code changes, but as a PMC member, I can reject 
other people’s changes. As a Foundation Member, I can express an opinion, but 
as a Director, I can state the official position of the Foundation.

The difficulty comes when, on a mailing list, I say something, intending it to 
be my personal opinion (i.e., Foundation Member hat) and someone reads it as 
the official position of the Foundation (i.e., Foundation Director hat).

Thus, in any given situation, I have an obligation to wield the smallest stick 
I possibly can, appropriate to the situation. Also, to clearly communicate how 
I am speaking, if there’s any chance of confusion, by saying things like 
"speaking as a member, and expressing my private opinion …", or "It is the 
opinion of the Board of Directors that …"  And, since there’s always a chance 
of confusion, due to many factors, it’s worthwhile to make this clarification 
almost every time, if you’re in a position where you do, in fact, wear multiple 
hats.

By wearing the smallest hat possible –i.e., speaking with the voice with the 
least authority– you allow other people to be free to express their own 
dissenting opinions without feeling that they have already been overruled. This 
is in line with our culture of providing a level playing field, where all 
voices are equal, and all opinions are weighed the same.

Rich Bowen has been doing open source-y stuff since about 1995, and has been a 
member of the Apache Software Foundation since 2002. He currently serves on the 
ASF Board of Directors. By day, he's the CentOS Community Manager, working for 
Red Hat.

= = =

"Success at Apache" is a monthly blog series that focuses on the processes 
behind why the ASF "just works" 
https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/category/SuccessAtApache

NOTE: you are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the 
[email protected] distribution list. To unsubscribe, send email from the 
recipient account to [email protected] with the word 
"Unsubscribe" in the subject line.

Reply via email to