I don't like it at all.

We shouldn't be inserting lesser known YAML syntax into things, especially
if we have to define a new "directive".

This would be moving Ansible down the wrong direction.





On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 5:14 PM, James Martin <[email protected]> wrote:

> Brian,
>
> That's interesting -- so if "!!merge" was specified somewhere down the
> line that var would get merged versus replaced?  I like it!
>
> - James
>
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Brian Coca <[email protected]> wrote:
> > this is easy to implement using yaml tags/directives, but would look a
> bit
> > diff:
> >
> > mysql: !!merge
> >   port: some_default_value4
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Ansible Project" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> > email to [email protected].
> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Ansible Project" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>



-- 
Michael DeHaan <[email protected]>
CTO, AnsibleWorks, Inc.
http://www.ansibleworks.com/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Ansible Project" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to