Le 14/01/23 12:57, Serge van Ginderachter claviotta : > On 23 January 2014 12:04, Guillaume Subiron <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Yes, that's exactly what I said, but this doesn't work as expected, > > because in the second file I can't reference objects that are created > > in the first. > > > > That's true. You'll need to look at the order in which the files are > parsed, and make sure you repeat certain references, > > It's enough to e.g. define an empty group, in the one file which is defined > with hosts in another, etc.
I'm sorry but I don't think that information redundancy will simplify my inventory… This is really not a solution. Don't you think the expected behavior would be that all non-executables files in the inventory directory be concatenated before being read by lib/ansible/inventory/dir.py ? All the static files in the directory should be parsed as a unique inventory. -- Guillaume Subiron Mail - [email protected] GPG - 5BC2 EADB Jabber - [email protected] IRC - maethor@(freenode|geeknode) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ansible Project" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
