Thanks, works like a charm.
Am Dienstag, 8. April 2014 20:07:18 UTC+2 schrieb John:
>
> Hi Christian,
>
> You are correct that there is a wait parameter to the ec2 module but
> unfortunately it will probably not get you what you want since an ec2
> instance in the "running" state does not necessary mean you can ssh to
> it.
> What we should probably add to this module is a wait for the system
> status check to be 'ok' which is what I do typically when using boto
> in python code.
>
> To solve your immediate problem I wouldn't use a prompt; instead you
> can wait for ssh to become available using the the wait_for module.
>
> Example:
>
> # register the var "ec2" when you launch it using the ec2 module
>
> - name: Add new instance to host group
> local_action: >
> add_host
> hostname={{ item.public_ip }}
> groupname=launched
> with_items: ec2.instances
>
> - name: Wait for SSH to come up
> local_action: >
> wait_for
> host={{ item.public_dns_name }}
> state=started
> port=22
> delay=60
> timeout=320
> with_items: ec2.instances
>
>
> As for idempotent behavior with the ec2 module you can use the id
> parameter, see
> http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/Run_Instance_Idempotency.html
>
>
> -John
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Christian Kaps
> <[email protected]<javascript:>>
> wrote:
> > I think the wait property on the EC2 module is exactly what I want.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Am Dienstag, 8. April 2014 09:13:59 UTC+2 schrieb Christian Kaps:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> in the most Playbooks about EC2 provisioning there exists a task which
> >> executes the pause module to wait for the instance to be available. Now
> that
> >> the EC2 module supports idempotency it is possible to run a playbook
> >> multiple times to add new features to an already provisioned instance.
> The
> >> problem now is that the pause module runs every time and waits for e.g.
> 2
> >> minutes. I know that I can use ^C-c to continue the task. But I think
> the
> >> best solution would be to execute the wait task only after the instance
> was
> >> provisioned. Is there any possibility to achieve such a behavior?
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Christian
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> > "Ansible Project" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an
> > email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
> > To post to this group, send email to
> > [email protected]<javascript:>.
>
> > To view this discussion on the web visit
> >
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ansible-project/ccd1cf5f-d344-4c9f-9860-28c012bdabfc%40googlegroups.com.
>
>
> >
> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ansible Project" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ansible-project/d96b77c1-526a-49c0-9a2c-f57842c1d3ca%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
