On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:54 AM, David Reagan <jer...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So, handlers seem like they are just special tasks that you can call with > the "notify" option. If that's the case, couldn't I just make a handler that > uses the at module instead of the service module? Actually, I think I've > done that already in a differen role.. Hmm... The problem with at is that you have to manually figure out how long something should take and hope it never takes over that and then try to randomize how quickly how many servers restart. Or you leave a lot of time between which makes it inefficient. Just saying it would be nice if we could already leverage all of the power of serial (including all of the niceties like max_fail_percentage). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ansible Project" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ansible-project+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to ansible-project@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ansible-project/CAJQqANe0znq%2BT-Sx8LdXpP7m8EXctSvp5%3DcN1qLdjEXG%2BzHi4w%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.