I'm having trouble parsing this one, sorry.

Would it be possible to see a git repo or something for this ticket that
minimally reproduces the question?


On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Mike Ray <[email protected]>
wrote:

> As of 1.6.2 (yes, not quite current, though I did not see anything in the
> changelog that addressed this), when using roles, each role is called
> relative to its own directory.
>
> E.g.
>
> playbook1.yml :
> ---
>  - hosts: '{{ hostlist }}'
>    remote_user: root
>    roles:
>     - role: apache2
>     - role: mysql
>
>
> Both apache2 and mysql roles will be called against the hosts defined by
> the host var 'hostlist'. This is all well and good; however, in our current
> setup, we have roles for generic functionality (e.g. apache, mysql, etc)
> and also server specific playbooks. These server specific playbooks have a
> few one-off tasks that do not apply to other roles. One of these might look
> like:
>
> server1.yml :
> ---
>  - hosts: '{{ hostlist }}'
>    remote_user: root
>    roles:
>      - role: apache2
>      - role: servers/myserver
>
> Currently with our apache playbook, we allow for overloading a variable in
> the top-level playbook to change with SSL certificate is used.
>
> server1.yml :
> ---
>  - hosts: '{{ hostlist }}'
>    remote_user: root
>    roles:
>      - role: apache2
>      - role: servers/myserver
>
>    vars:
>      - certificate: "not_default_cert.crt"
>
> However, this means when the apache2 playbook runs it will expand {{
> certificate }} to "not_default_cert.crt" and the only way it would work is
> if that certificate exists in the apache2 folder directory (e.g.
> roles/apache2/files/not_default_cert.crt).
>
> If there is only one such file, it won't ever be too bad, but if many
> servers needed to overload that file, we'd end up with many "extra" files
> in that directory that really don't apply to that role. It would be nicer
> if those files could reside in their own server specific directory (e.g.
> roles/servers/myserver/files/not_default_cert.crt). That way the "base"
> role would only have the absolutely necessary files and all specific files
> could reside within the server's playbook to which they belonged.
>
> To my understanding there is no such "search for files here and also here"
> directive, nor any sort of inheritance that currently accomplishes this.
>
> As stated before, I am running 1.6.2, so if this functionality is
> implemented, I apologize, and I will upgrade when I have the chance.
>
> If others have come across this problem and have a different
> organizational implementation that avoids this issue, I'd love to hear it.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Ansible Project" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ansible-project/62e923b1-f78a-4fc8-98a3-b5b2cebe8d81%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ansible-project/62e923b1-f78a-4fc8-98a3-b5b2cebe8d81%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Ansible Project" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ansible-project/CA%2BnsWgzGWDS7hSr%3DdCKE-CfeHPyGoW%2BBKy3sKd-Gs93tsuKSuA%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to