On Saturday, October 25, 2014 at 2:09:22 AM UTC+2, Michael DeHaan wrote:
>
> I think your filter plugin could be more easily written:
>
> hash_a.update(hash_b)
>
> perhaps?
>
> If you send in a pull request, this seems reasonable to have as a core
> filter.
>
> I'd probably call it 'update' if I'm correct on the above, which I think I
> am. If not, perhaps "merge".
>
>>
>>
I had exactly the same idea. Did anybody do a PR for this? I don't see it
in 1.9 nor in devel.
If nobody else has time for it I could do it. I think this is really a gap.
Anyway this way is definitely more what they call *pythonic* than tweaking
the union filter.
My code is simply:
def update(dic, odic):
dic.update(odic)
return dic
class FilterModule(object):
def filters(self):
return {
'update': update,
'update_dict': update,
'merge_dict': update
}
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ansible Project" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ansible-project/19a0eb26-c285-462a-8beb-9983b1733b86%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
