I don't see a reason it would not. First ansible normally is run in push mode so not much for it to manage 'locally'.
Managing services would be the same as with full clients, the issue here is handling the per server specific configs and general configs. Most of this can be done with ansible looking at only the 'master' and treating slave configs as a special path. Another option is to have ansible know about the slaves and delegate changes for the slaves to the master + additional pathing to the correct slave configs. -- Brian Coca -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ansible Project" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ansible-project/CAJ5XC8m%3DBGcCUCT4N61gHY08rRdHcqYv1CPF6jF9-0ECP9fqMA%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
