Yes, That would indeed cause the opposite problem when creating groups! Didn’t really think about that, was focusing on the deletion Yes, probably adding a ‘local_only’ to both the modules makes more sense, and should keep the return correct in both cases.
Thanks, Andrea > On 18 Sep 2015, at 19:24, Brian Coca <[email protected]> wrote: > > Won't that cause the opposite problem when creating groups? Also I > believe the return is correct, it failed to delete the group as it is > not a local group and will still be present on the machine. We might > want to add a 'local_only' flag to both this and user to be more > specific on what you want as a user. > > > > -- > Brian Coca > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ansible Project" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ansible-project/CAJ5XC8nTg86wyDHgj_aBLLsG6aLVNufAEM0mqbmkk2BoQMt1Yw%40mail.gmail.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ansible Project" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ansible-project/4674FF60-84EE-4A66-A67A-696A97EA99F6%40andreatartaglia.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
