+1

I'm also interested in this issue, as tagging includes is a core
practice in my workflow.

On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 4:17 AM, Michel Blanc <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Playing with 2.0, I just stumbled on:
>
>   [DEPRECATION WARNING]: You should not specify tags in the include
>   parameters. All tags should be specified using the task-level option.
>   This feature will be removed in a future release.
>
>
> So, basically, this means that you cannot do this anymore:
>
>
> myrole/tasks/main.yml:
>
>       - include: setup.yml tags=myrole,setup
>       - include: myrole.yml tags=myrole
>
>
> This pattern is very handy: it lets you "assign" tags on all tasks in a
> file. This helps keeping tasks descriptions less verbose, and improves
> readability
>
> If I understand the warning correctly, we won't be able to do that in
> the future. What is the rationale behind the decision ? Will there be an
> alternate way to do it (besides blocks) ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> M
> --
> Michel Blanc
> { :github => "@leucos", :twitter => "@b9m", :gpg => "0X24B35C22" }
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Ansible Project" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ansible-project/563EE8FD.4080105%40mbnet.fr.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



-- 
Ivan Sichmann Freitas

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Ansible Project" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ansible-project/CAG2tFJwn%2Ba7bMJFFJSP4veHYoLw4teZUj8J_3hEQMTT-dbqrSg%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to