My under standing of delegate_to means “run the command you would have run locally on this particular host”, yes? Delegating the command says “run this particular command on this particular host” and a delegated fetch says “run this fetch but run it from this particular host”, I may be totally off here as I only started working with Ansible a few weeks ago but that is the behavior I am seeing.
> On Jun 7, 2016, at 12:57 PM, Adam Morris <[email protected]> wrote: > > so, realistically you are saying that a delegated fetch does not do what is > expected but a delegated command does. > > My understanding is that delegate effectively changes the target, so fetch > with delegate should involve the ansible host pulling the certificate from > the ca server. If this is not the case then it seems to be a bug. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google > Groups "Ansible Project" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/ansible-project/-bEDcrqbbVs/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ansible-project/8b6e8193-c755-4ab0-9539-a0588904dacc%40googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ansible Project" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ansible-project/60E56051-DFCC-401C-A2C0-CCEA4CBBF983%40sparkred.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
