Funny thing is that if I refactor to explicitly include instead of meta dependencies I hit this bug, https://github.com/ansible/ansible/issues/23609.
El jueves, 13 de julio de 2017, 15:45:49 (UTC+2), Jose Luis Fernández Pérez escribió: > > Oh I see > > I have changed the code and if I include the role by means of include_role > in the main tasks I get the expected result. > > --- > - include_role: > name: some_other_role > > - debug: var=some_variable > > > Why specifying role dependencies in the meta, and explicitly including > them has different results? Shouldnt they be the same? > > I think this is a bug. > > > El jueves, 13 de julio de 2017, 15:24:46 (UTC+2), Brian Coca escribió: >> >> The private setting does not affect dependencies as those are >> specifically 'included' by the role. It is only mean to keep role vars >> from polluting the rest of the play. >> >> >> ---------- >> Brian Coca >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ansible Project" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ansible-project/984fe314-3aaf-428b-997e-36d5094bf121%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
