On Friday, October 5, 2018 at 3:30:08 PM UTC-5, Dmitry Makovey wrote: > > Hi, I would like to clarify things relating to new "import_role" statement > - documentation mentions it as a "new syntax" however it does not mention > about the plans for the "roles" syntax. What's the plan moving forward. I > see both statements as distinct entities, however some of my colleagues > seem to be confused about the state of affairs so we'd like some > clarification on the matter. > > So, to re-phrase my question differently: > > is there a merit in abandoning "roles:" statement from our playbooks > moving forward in favor of "import_role" to future-proof our code? >
Additional question: Can "import_role: " or "include_role: ", accept a list of roles? Examples appear to only have one role. "Roles: " examples usually show a list of one or more roles. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ansible Project" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ansible-project/1be03434-bfa7-4c9c-84ba-f02ae10318f5%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
