I just discovered that you can use:

  collections:
   - my_namespace.my_collection

in a playbook to avoid having to type the FQCN of a module.  However, how 
are namespace collisions handled?  It seems impractical that every 
collection would have unique module names.  In fact I was counting on 
people's use of FQCN to allow me to shorten my collections' module names.  
So I ended up with a module named 'pfsensbile.core.setup' that is 
conflicting with the built in 'setup' module when 'collections: - 
pfsensible.core' is used in the play.  See 
https://github.com/opoplawski/ansible-pfsense/issues/44.  Is it possible to 
avoid this?   In some way it seems like ansible itself should always prefer 
its own core modules.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Ansible Project" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ansible-project/8cb728a4-ccef-45b9-a1bd-dcc3a148079b%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to