Here you go...
https://www.reddit.com/r/ansible/comments/di4o6h/how_to_break_the_loop/



On Thursday, December 11, 2014 at 10:41:55 AM UTC-5, Hugh Saunders wrote:
>
> Hi All, 
> I've been asking on IRC,  twitter 
> <https://twitter.com/wherenow_hugh/status/543048678588829696>, and github 
> <https://github.com/ansible/ansible/issues/9782> about this and was asked 
> to post to the ML as well so here goes :)
>
> I would like to be able to exit a with_items loop based on the result of 
> the previous iteration. Think of it as a generalisation of 
> with_first_found. 
>
> Two use cases: 
>
>    1. I have a list of mirrors known to host file, I want to iterate over 
>    that list until I successfully retrieve the file, then stop iterating. No 
>    point in downloading the file multiple times.
>    2. I have a git ref (branch/tag) and a list of mirrors of that repo (
>    git.openstack.org, github.com), I want to resolve that ref to a SHA 
>    without cloning the repo. Run git ls-remote via shell passing in each 
>    remote url in turn until the ref is successfully resolved. No point in 
>    resolving it twice. Note that for this use case I do not want to clone the 
>    repo. 
>
> I'm sure there are other situations where it would be useful to break out 
> of a loop. 
>
> As explained in the issue, I can think of two ways of doing this, both 
> would require modifications to ansible: 
>
>    1. Add previous_iteration variable for use in when clause, eg when: 
>    previous_iteration | failed
>    2. Allow registered variable to be used within a loop, eg when: 
>    shell_result['results'][-1].rc != 0
>    
>
> Thanks for any insight. 
>
> --
> Hugh Saunders
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Ansible Project" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ansible-project/a15f0310-08e0-4805-a593-b90115b67a4b%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to