Yes of course , it should look  like this
```
all                   - "alle interessierenden Hosts, auch nicht per 
ansible kontrollierbare"
controllable          - Alle Hosts, die mit ansible kontrolliert werden 
koennten
fm174                 - Alle Hosts in FM 174 (soweit Ansible-fähig)
hetzner               - Alle Hosts bei Hetzner (cloud)
virtual_ansible_hosts - Nicht per Ansible erreichbare Maschinen, aber sie 
sollen durch (Meta-) Variablen doukmentiert werden
virtual_FM174         - Virtuelle Ansible Hosts in FM174

```
ra...@linuxia.de schrieb am Mittwoch, 8. Februar 2023 um 09:47:53 UTC+1:

> On 08/02/2023 09:21, Norbert Klamann wrote:
> > Hello all,
> > i use Ansible to document and manage a small network of computers and 
> other devices. So I bulit an inventory with several groups and hosts and 
> defined a bunch of variables  on each level to describe what i want to 
> achieve,  Each host and each group has for example a variable named 
> `host_comment` or `group_comment` respectively.
> >
> > This is very useful on the host level, but i want to show the group 
> variables separately in a loop over all groups.
> >
> > I can show a group variable via `hostvars[host].group_comment`but 
> because every hosts belongs to several groups i cannot control, whicht name 
> is displayed.
> >
> > This template
> > ```
> > {% forgroupingroupsifgroup!='ungrouped'%}
> >   {% forhostingroups[group]%}
> >   {% ifloop.first%}{% sethvh=hostvars[host]%}
> > {{ group }}{{ hvh.group_comment }}
> >   {% endif%}
> >   {% endfor%}
> > {% endfor%}
> > ```
> >
> > gives
> > ```
> >   all     Nicht per Ansible erreichbare Maschinen, aber sie sollen durch 
> (Meta-) Variablen doukmentiert werden
> >   lxc_container     Alle Hosts in FM 174 (soweit Ansible-fähig)
> >   fm174     Alle Hosts in FM 174 (soweit Ansible-fähig)
> >   hetzner     Alle Hosts bei Hetzner (cloud)
> >   controllable     Alle Hosts in FM 174 (soweit Ansible-fähig)
> >   virtual_FM174     Virtuelle Ansible Hosts in FM174
> >   virtual_ansible_hosts     Nicht per Ansible erreichbare Maschinen, 
> aber sie sollen durch (Meta-) Variablen doukmentiert werden
> >
> > ```
> > I think it is visible that this result makes no sense.
>
> Hello Norbert,
>
> can you give an example of the desired output?
>
> Regards
>
>             Racke
>
>
> >
> > Can anyone help here ?
> >
> > Thanks a lot !
> >
> > Norbert
> >
> >
> > -- 
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> Groups "Ansible Project" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
> an email to ansible-proje...@googlegroups.com.
> > To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ansible-project/fadc4912-aaab-4cfa-aa18-22dd5fe1d12dn%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ansible-project/fadc4912-aaab-4cfa-aa18-22dd5fe1d12dn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer
> >.
>
>
> -- 
> Automation expert - Ansible and friends
> Linux administrator & Debian maintainer
> Perl Dancer & conference hopper
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Ansible Project" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ansible-project+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ansible-project/74860064-0aef-4a92-acb3-4ff9cdfd0efcn%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to