Conor MacNeill wrote: > > The new interfaces you are using here are part of JAXP 1.1, > is that correct? I think this is still early access, so I'm > not sure whether we should jump up to these just yet. Also, > whilst these classes are in the xalan source tree, they did > not seem to get put into a jar. They are in the jaxp.jar > that comes with jaxp1.1 EA2, but I was just wondering whether > the xalan project will also produce them in a jar.
They are put in a jar if you build Xalan2. Xalan2 is in the java subdirectory. > I haven't got strong opinions here either way so if any style > task users do have an opinion, I'd like to here it now. Conor - I'd like to take this one. in particular, I would like to create a new liaison for TRaX so people can continue to use Xalan1. I plan to commit this change today or tomorrow. > I have also just committed a change by Jeff Martin that > changes the XSLTLiaison interface. You'll need to add that > in too, if this is to go ahead. No problem... - Sam Ruby
