Costin Manolache wrote:
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can someone please apply my patch for the [GUMP] Build Failure -
I've applied a slightly different patch, please check it still does what you want 8-)
Basically I've removed the manifest attributes (guess Costin has forgotten to commit the manifest), added <mkdir>s for ${ant.home}/lib and added the two targets you needed.
I have not touched Costin's original property definitions but replace them from within the Gump descriptor instead. I have no idea what velocity-dep might be, though.
Sorry, I didn't have time to do the commit
np, Stefan came to the rescue :-)
- the velocity-dep was used
to test the velocity dynamic properties, it's something that seems to be generated in the build process for velocity.
Ah.
My home internet is broken, and I have some high priority things to do -
but I would like to start removing the embed proposal ( and move what is acceptable into the main tree ). The only major issue is a decision on the top-level execution ( which is different in the main tree and embed ).
Anyway there are still some patches I have to roll in there, and in the meantime this gump thing will help. Centipede relies very heavily on it, so we need it to work darn well ;-)
Thanks for taking time to reply, hoping to see ya back soon!
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
