Paul Philion wrote: > > Sam and Kevin - > > Oops... I've already started porting javadoc to a stand alone "javadoc" > call. Further, I've found a number of problems with the package name > pattern matching stuff. > > Who wants this? Or I can do it.
Rock on. First come first serve :) > (As background: I was getting log4j set up with ant, and I decided to > try the javadoc option. So I got sidetracked and spent several hours > last night trying to clean up Javadoc.java instead of building wrappers > for log4j.) > > - Paul Philion Why are we using log4j within Ant? -- Kevin A Burton Senior Software Engineer Kendara Inc http://www.kendara.com Mobile: 408-910-6145 Linux - The revolution will NOT be televised
