+1 on the name change -1 on introducing beaninfo class. I think the introspection is much simpler to manage and understand. Of course changing all the build.xml files isn't fun either :-(
Conor > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, 3 February 2000 12:45 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Problems with 1.3RC1 and taskdef > > > Alternatively, we could introduce a beaninfo class for the > various classes? > > Any votes on that idea? > -- > dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting > Work: http://www.multitask.com.au > Play: http://www.trongus.com > I've just returned from THE Java Programming Conference, > http://www.SoftwareSummit.com - be there next year > > ----- Forwarded by dIon Gillard/Multitask Consulting/AU on > 03/02/2000 12:44 > ----- > > > > > > > > Submitted by Category . Public > > "Conor <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > MacNeill" ta.apache.org> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > on 03/02/2000 > at 00:36 > > (Embedded > image moved to > file: > pic21350.pcx) > > > > RE: Problems with 1.3RC1 and taskdef > > > Dion, > > I didn't the details of your problem but I have run into a problem > (probably > the same) with 1.3RC1. The Java task does not work. It appears to be > because > the introspector does not find the setClass method in Java.java. I changed > ProjectHelper to dump the names of all the properties as it loops through > them and all appear but setClass doesn't appear. I changed the method > setClassname, changed the <java element to use classname="..." and it > works. > > I'm not sure why this is since it works on 1.1.8 and 1.2.2 (NT). Is it a > bug > in JDK1.3RC1? Perhaps a simple name change would be expeditious anyway > > Cheers > Conor > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, 2 February 2000 7:55 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Problems with 1.3RC1 and taskdef > > > > > > Any comments on my 1.3RC1 problems with taskdef? Is anyone else > > having them > > or using taskdef under 1.3? > > > > The bug does NOT appear under IBM1.1.8. > > -- > > dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting > > Work: http://www.multitask.com.au > > Play: http://www.trongus.com > > I've just returned from THE Java Programming Conference, > > http://www.SoftwareSummit.com - be there next year > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Previous Document (Embe (Embe Next Document > > dded dded > > image image > > moved moved > > to to > > file: file: > > pic13 pic29 > > 337.p 498.p > > cx) cx) > > > > Return to > View > > > (Embedded image > moved to > file: > pic03809.pcx) > > > > >
