Fotis Jannidis wrote: > > Concerning the discussion about what kind of task to implement etc.: Why > don't leave > things as they are but build up a repository for additional tasks? So if I > need xslt I can > go there. > Fotis
It could be done cleaner... perhaps from a org.apache.tools.ant.optional.taskdefs package. The optional ones would be defined through properties. Then all you would have to do is have an extra .jar in your classpath. I honestly don't like this. However, I received a -1 on adding the .jar and making it standard. All in all I think that we end up with a larger kludge. Kevin -- Kevin A Burton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://relativity.yi.org Message to SUN: "Open Source Java!" "For evil to win is for good men to do nothing."
