Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: <snip> > > -perhaps validation of build.xml files > > You mean creating a DTD/Xschema for Ant? Well, I don't have anything > against this, but it needs _costant_ update and it's very easy to make > it fall behind. > > But I agree that validation is a good thing.
This is interesting. I don't know perfect this is. +0. You would always have to ship a .dtd or xsd with your Ant and point to it. My build.xml files only get tweaked about once a month so I don't think validation should be a major priority. Kevin -- Kevin A Burton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://relativity.yi.org Message to SUN: "Please Open Source Java!" "For evil to win is for good men to do nothing."
