>>>>> "sr" == rubys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
sr> Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> Personally I'd prefer binding properties later - during task >> execution not parsing that is. sr> This is exactly the issue that generated much heated discussion sr> on this list. I've allready got that impression, yes. sr> I believe that everyone would agree that allowing properties to sr> be defined inside of targets but executed at parse time is sr> confusing. So please, please, please mention this in the documentation. Almost every newcommer will stumble over this as I did. I have no problem with keeping property and taskdef tasks the way they behave right now - after your patch, because it feels better to have them outside of targets. I would volunteer to change docs/index.html but english is not my native language so I hesitate to write more than javadoc comments. Stefan
