>>>>> "SM" == Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SM> Stefan Bodewig wrote >> While I think full validation is of low priority checking whether >> buld.xml is at least well formed and providing better error >> messages would be helpfull. SM> +1, this is already in the todo list Maybe Xerces would provide more usable error messages and thus just switching the parser would help? I know you are involved with xml.apache.org projects so maybe you could comment on this? >> It took me a rather long time to see that the parser shipped with >> Ant chokes on comments inside elements >> >> nsgmls didn't complain at all SM> nsgmls is not exactly the bext xml editor available... OK, http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-xml-19980210#sec-comments quite clearly says nsgmls was wrong. It (nsgmls) was the one I had on my disk as I'm using DocBook - the SGML version - to document my code (design documents, user manuals all the boring stuff you're forced to do). SM> unfortunately, it's one of the best you get for free Other recommendations? Stefan
