There were many problems with method prototypes... sorry, but I can't
reproduce it now as I found the binary distribution and blew away my old src
one :(
Now for an ant-newbie question:
Should the javac task build out a similar class file directory structure to
the source structure. The situation that I'm encountering (to my surprise)
is that I have a source structure like:
src/com/thinker/event/*.java
build/classes
When I run the javac task as:
<javac srcdir="${src.dir}"
destdir="${build.classes}"
classpath="${classpath}"
debug="on"
deprecation="on"
optimize="on" >
</javac>
where src.dir is "src" and build.classes="build/classes" I loose the
com/thinker/event directory structure and all the class files are dumped
into build/classes - which causes my subsequent jar task to fail as it's
looking for class files from com/thinker/event :(
<jar jarfile="${lib.dir}/${name}.jar"
basedir="${build.classes}"
includes="com/**"
Any thoughts?
Rick...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Conor MacNeill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2000 7:06 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Windows 98?
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ken Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, 17 May 2000 5:51
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Windows 98?
> >
> >
> > Not sure why you'd want to build it...
> > I just grabbed the so-called binaries,
> > since they are just jar files, and I've
> > used them successfully out of the box
> > on Windows 2000, Windows NT, and Solaris
> > 2.5.1 and Solaris 2.6.
> >
> > That is one of the beauties of java, is it not?
> > If you built it on linux, use it on '98...
> >
>
> That is true, indeed. Nevertheless, it would be good to be
> able to build ant
> on all platforms. There may be Win98 users who do not have a
> Linux/NT/Solaris/whatever system to build ant. Perhaps Rick
> can tell us the
> sorts of problems he is encountering.
>
> Conor
>
