> > The point of my mail has been that there has already been a discussion > about the PATH issue some weeks ago and that a solution - at least a > partial one - was on the way. I just wanted to save us all from some > duplicate effort. > > I didn't want to say "this has been done, there will be a solution and > that's it". I hope I didn't sound like this - please tell me if I did. >
No, not at all. I was just pointing out that many people would not have been aware of the code. I agree we should not duplicate effort (that's why I went and had a look at the JUnit Path/PathElement code). With the current backlog of patches, there is an increasing chance of things getting done twice :-( Cheers Conor
