James Duncan Davidson wrote: > > on 2000/06/17 17:08, Rick Yazwinski at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Wouldn't this depend on the architecture's implementation of threads? I'd > > expect on a truely multitasking box (Solaris or Linux, for example) with > > multiple processors that you would see a performance improvement. > > Except that javac runs in a single thread I beleive. You can span a thread > across processors. :) >
Correct, however if have never seen the processor load for a single javac task above 100/n %, where n is the number of processors on my Sun E420 > Note that I'm not for mt ant at all. > > > Has anyone brought up the potential of "distributed ant"? It kinda fits > > with the async talk... > > Distrubted ant? Complexity overload anyone? > Well I still need a JavaSpaces project to start with, now I can finally implement the 'replicated-worker pattern', so if you can arrange the funding :-) > .duncan -- Mark Brouwer
