on 2000/06/20 09:21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Seriously, I doubt that anybody will question an optional task that is > conditionally compiled. +1, just make sure that it's in /optional/[taskname] or some such. I think that a pattern was suggested in the core doc, but if not, set one that allows for future expansion. We can fine tune as we go. My general thought on contrib/optional tasks is that anything should be able to go there -- a very much less controlled space. This is also one of the reasons why I really want to keep the core simple and clean (as possible) -- because I totally want task developers to go wild and have a good base to write on. .duncan
