on 2000/06/23 01:39, Stefan Bodewig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>>>>> "mf" == mpfoemme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > mf> But I think I prefer the following, since it allows multiple > mf> tasks to depend on a single compile: > > mf> <taskdef name="xslt" classname="Xslt" classpath="lib" > mf> depends="xslt-compile"/> > > Yes, I really like this. This would remove the need for arbitrary > tasks to be defined outside of targets. No bad feelings on my side > anymore. > > This could mean: no tasks outside targets, put taskdefs and properties > directly into the project if they should have global meaning and put > them inside of targets for target scoped properties and taskdefs, > right?
Something like that. The purist in me still wants to see props and taskdefs be global since we're really not trying to write a programming language here. But that could just be my head in the fog of last night on the town in Prague. :) But that's a different thread -- for this thread of discussion, yes, I like this as well. .duncan
