Stefan Bodewig wrote: > 1. You've convinced me that tasks outside of targets are a good > thing with the "no targets at all" example. If I want this > functionality I'll need to allow for tasks outside of targets > in the general case - still don't like it but there is no other > way taking the simplicity goal into account. > > 2. I still want the depends attribute on taskdefs to allow users > that don't want tasks outside of targets to generate their > taskdefs on the fly.
Good summary. If there aren't any objections, I'll volunteer for #1. Any takers for #2? - Sam Ruby P.S. I believe that #2 is harder than one might otherwise expect.
