Conor MacNeill writes: [snip] > > (2) I feel returning the lookahead String in nextToken instead of > > scanning for a DOS path could be wrong in very strange cases (take > > c:d:\path for example, this would return c, d, \path). I could be > > wrong but maybe make it something like
Is c:d:\path a valid path on DOSalike systems? I'd have thought c:;d:\path would be the way to express that; c:d:\path isn't really valid on anything, is it? Regards Tom
