> From: Thomas Haas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Conor MacNeill) wrote: > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Thomas Haas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [snip] > > > > > > I would love to add subpackages to > > > > > > org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional > > > > > > > Can we work out a simple standard for this area then? > > how about the package being equal to the name of the task. > That wouldn't help because we would get as many subpackages as we have optional tasks now; what would we gain by introducing subpackages then?. As I'm no ant developer I'm reluctant to make a complete proposal here. But IMHO the tasks should be put in more general packages. E.g. I would put all EJB related tasks in a .ejb package, all version control tasks in a .sccm package, etc. If this is not enough, one could add subpackages for the different products, e.g. .ejb.wls, .ejb.inprise, .sccm.cvs, .sccm.pvcs, ...
Wolf
