the problem I would have with that is it produces the same affect as doing a build all which is what I am trying to avoid. (this means you have to be a lot more careful with dependencies but would save me a lot of time).
Dennis > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 10:47 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: no response?? RE: building . . . > > > > On our project, we've configured our SCM tool (starteam) to set the > timestamps of checked out files to the current time, instead > of the time of > the last checkin. This is the equivalent of touching each > file after it > gets checked out, and causes them to be rebuilt... > > > > > > "Winkley, > > Dennis To: > "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > x66244" cc: > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: no > response?? RE: building . . . > .adp.com> > > > > 07/12/2000 > > 11:39 AM > > Please > > respond to > > ant-dev > > > > > > > > > > why hasn't anybody said anything about this... I'd appreciate at least > hearing peoples opinion even if it's negative... > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Winkley, Dennis x66244 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2000 2:55 PM > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > Subject: building only changed files after getting those files from > > versio n control system > > > > > > I am currently working on a project for which ant has been > > chosen as the > > build tool. I was wondering if anyone had figured out a way > > to make sure > > any 'new' files checked out from a version control system are > > built without > > completely cleaning the directory. The issue here is that I > > may have done a > > build after the time that a file was checked in (i.e. I do > a get every > > morning and may very well have done a build at say 4:00 the > > previous day but > > someone checked in a file at noon on the previous day so the > > class file date > > is still later than the source file date). > > > > If this hasn't been dealt with, I was wondering if it might > > be possible to > > make it so the javac task sets a class files date to match > > the source file > > date and then have it compile any file where the dates aren't > > exact matches. > > ?? > > > > Dennis > > > > >
