Stefan, Looks sweet.
One thing. If you go to http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/ant/release/ I'm guessing most people would pick the 3.1 release to download. I think we need to either remove that release to somewhere else (prerelease ?) or add a readme that says version 1.1 is later than version 3.1 :-) Conor > -----Original Message----- > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, 18 July 2000 18:46 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Almost ANNOUNCE: Ant Release 1.1 > > > Hi, > > I've put together what I think is release 1.1 of Ant, see > <http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/ant/release/v1.1/>. > > Some points I want to see cleared before I go around and make an > official announcement of it: > > (1) I've included jaxp.jar and parser.jar with both the source and the > binary releases. This is what Tomcat does as well so I thought it would > be OK. > > (2) The binary release has been compiled using IBM's JDK 1.3 on > Linux. I've not encountered any problems either with Blackdown's 1.2.2 > nor 1.1.7v3 but couldn't check on Windows. > > (3) The binary release itself consists of the core and only the core. > > (4) optional.jar in the bin directory contains all the optional tasks > I can build, i.e. everything except the Liaison and ejb classes. If > anybody else could contribute the class files, I'll include them. > > (5) A question to Sam, .duncan, Craig or whoever else is reading this > message and has done a release before. Who is going to change the > *index.html pages in /downloads? > > Stefan >
