Ken, I just saw them. As you'll see in my other post, I'm not thrilled about the workaround proposeds. Shall we form the Coalition for Access to Mutable Properties (CAMP)? ;-)
roger Ken Liu wrote: > Roger, you can see from the recent thread "help! Can't I set a <property> > more than once in a build file?" that I had the same kind of problem. I set > up some properties and then call an <ant> target that takes those properties > as parameters. > > I'm with you, target-local variables/properties would be great. > > Ken > > > As an alternative, I might propose adding target-local variables that > > behave like properties, but only within target scope. > > > > Roger Vaughn > > > > > >
