Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> >>>>> "RV" == Roger Vaughn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> RV> So, I would suggest these things: - If the property task is to
> RV> remain a taskdef, evaluate it at runtime, with mutability and all
> RV> that entails. Otherwise, change the DTD to clarify - perhaps
> RV> elevate property defs to parallel target defs (which leaves room
> RV> for NO misunderstanding).
>
> Actually <property> already is at the same level as <target>. I now
> regret we didn't take the full swing to forbid placing them inside of
> targets.
>
> If we go back to mutable properties and make the ${} expansion happen
> at runtime, this is a different issue.
>
> Stefan
Oh, obviously I didn't realize that. I have to agree (in retrospect) with
your regret.
Well, everyone breathe a sigh of relief. I think I've been enough of a
pest now and my opinions have been heard, like 'em or not. (And I don't
expect everyone to agree, honestly.) I'm gonna let this die for now.
Thanks for listening.
roger
