>>>>> "PP" == Paul Philion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
PP> Note: I'm not suggesting that that is something that should be PP> supported, or that it is something anyone would ever use. I'm PP> just trying to point out potential issues. I'm aware of the limitation my approach imposes - and didn't want to say yours would be unreasonable. I was just thinking loud to see which way would be the preferred one - as we seem to agree to move to runtime evaluation. Stefan
