>>>>> "CM" == Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
CM> Just one issue with this patch. Do we want to expand on the use CM> of build.compiler.* properties? I actually would like to get rid CM> of them altogether - too implicit for me. Big +1 from me. I'd like to see a solution for all these cases where you might have a couple of alternative implementations for some kind of functionality. jar/fastjar, rmic/jiffy, the various idl2java implementations ... Unfortunately I have no idea how to handle this cleanly. Creating a base class with a bloated set of attributes (everything any implementation might need) or something like <javac ...> <jikes emacs="yes" pedantic="no" /> </javac> which would ignore the nested jikes element unless we actually want to use jikes? Both are possible and I'm not too thrilled by either of each. Stefan
