Yah, I can revisit this. It was based on the code in 1.0.8 or earlier. I lifted most of it from the Exec task, but the class itself (obviously) follows the MatchingTask pattern to get that interface. I recall that I threw out some of the Exec features I didn't need at the time. I'll take a look and try to rewrite (and reuse) based on the 1.1 code.
roger Stefan Bodewig wrote: > >>>>> "RV" == Roger Vaughn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > RV> I'm donating the source to the project - you will see that I > RV> borrowed heavily from existing tasks anyway. > > Yes, do you think you could rewrite it to reuse existing code a little > more? I'm thinking of the StreamPumper part, the cd logic and so > on. Maybe ExecuteOn could be a better parent class than MatchingTask. > > What do you think? > > Stefan
