On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Diane Holt wrote: > Sorry this turned into a bigger thing than I'd thought it would. All I can > say is that these particular files don't depend on any others, other than > the "library" classes (if that's the right term for Java) from the > classpath -- and no others depend on them. They're just these little > entities unto themselves. They live where they do in the source tree > because, like any source-tree structure, the subdir they live in says > something about what they are. And also because there are other > (non-compiler) utilities that garner information about them, based on > that.
This may be a dumb question - but why don't you just package them in appropriate package ? > (Actually, come to think of it, I'll need to anyway, if my suggestion to > get rid of the extra line of space between the target-names in the logging > output doesn't get picked up either, and since I never heard anything back > from anyone about that one, I'm guessing it won't be. So, oh well...) you can write your own logger (at one stage I had a custom one till they added -emacs option) and use -logger com.biz.MyLoggerClass (or something like that) to get custom logger. However I would like to see a quiter version of logger as default too :P Cheers, Pete *--------------------------------------------------* | Latrobe University, | Does the name 'Pavlov' | | Bundoora, Australia | ring a bell ? | *--------------------------------------------------*
